The
Election Observation Mission of the European Union, which has kept a constant
presence in Peru since the end of February, will be soon completed by the
further coming of 32 Short Term Observers and by a team of twelve members of the
European Parliament. As occurred for the first round (8 April), the mission will
recuperate full staff for the second round Election Day, presumably the 3 June.
Meanwhile,
the permanent staff of the mission held a press conference last Friday to
present the findings of their observations so far. The EU-EOM verified that, in
general terms, the electoral process is satisfactorily underway in compliance
with the international standards. The political campaign of both candidates
continues with rallies and debates, which help to clarify and serve as a
commitment for a free, competitive, and well-informed voting process.
However,
the European observers stressed that some problems still overshadow this
positive appraisal: once more the campaign was poisoned with revelations removed
from the political debate against both candidates. Added to this is the invalid
or blank vote proposal, all of which is damaging the outside image of the
campaign.
The
Mission underlines the fact that, the individual blank vote is legitimate and so
is the blank vote campaign. What is doubtful is the appearance of a movement –
displeased with the results of a free, clean and competitive first round –
backing the null and blank vote during the course of the same elections,
specially in the transitional situation in which Peru is living at present.
The
European statement also focused on problems in how electoral institutions are
operating, referring to the evident slow vote counting process after 8 April and
to the underlying problems in the electoral preparation in face of the second
round. It specified that a detail which is not entirely compatible with
international standards is the excessively long lapse of time between the two
rounds, and that explanations given by the electoral institutions on the matter
can be considered valid but insufficient, since complaints have not exceeded the
foreseen amount.
Finally,
after an explosive artifact was left in the immediate vicinity of the National
Jury for Elections, putting at risk the lives of passerbys, the EU-EOM expressed
its deepest feelings of solidarity with the citizenry and Peruvian institutions
who, in a not so far away past, experienced a merciless terrorism.